LegalTec 100

We believe that IT departments who maintain latest versions of software and provide innovative alternatives or additions should be recognised for these achievements. We also believe that these results will not only give Partners and their clients the confidence that they are in safe hands and demonstrate a real comparable return on the investment they are making, but will also enable firms to keep and attract real talent.

The 3 key aims of the LegalTec100 are to:

• Recognise Innovation
• Promote advancement of technology
• Encourage sustainability initiatives

The LegalTec 100

	Position	Previous	Firm	Version Score	Green Score	Innovation Score	Grand Total
	1	n/a	SJ Berwin	70	18	58	146
	2	n/a	DLA Piper	74	18	53	145
	3	n/a	Hogan Lovells	68	18	52	138
	4	n/a	Pinsent Masons LLP	67	18	51	136
	5	n/a	Berwin Leighton Paisner	63	17	56	136
	6	n/a	Bond Pearce LLP	63	16	52	131
	7	n/a	Goldsmith Williams	64	10	55	129
	8	n/a	Allen & Overy	57	18	51	126
	9	n/a	Burges Salmon	68	13	45	126
	10	n/a	Taylor Vinters	66	12	46	124
	11	n/a	Hill Dickinson	68	6	49	123
	12	n/a	Ogiers	63	14	43	120
	13	n/a	Simmons & Simmons	57	20	43	120
	14	n/a	Silverbeck Rymer	63	13	44	120
	15	n/a	Adjust Solicitors	64	15	39	118
	16	n/a	Field Fisher Waterhouse	57	18	42	117
	17	n/a	Dundas & Wilson	61	15	41	117
	18	n/a	Mills & Reeve	59	6	48	113
	19	n/a	Norton Rose	61	8	43	112
	20	n/a	CMS Cameron Mckenna	61	11	40	112
	21	n/a	Bristows	63	16	33	112
	22	n/a	Winckworth Sherwood	57	16	39	112
	23	n/a	Linklaters	56	6	45	107
	24	n/a	A&L Goodbody	63	11	36	110
	25	n/a	Travers Smith	68	8	34	110
	26	n/a	Biggart Baillie	67	16	26	109
	27	n/a	Nabbaro	68	11	29	108
	28	n/a	Morgan Cole	57	10	38	105
	29	n/a	Clifford Chance	44	18	42	104
	30	n/a	RPC	48	16	40	104
	31	n/a	Ward Hadaway	61	16	26	103
	32	n/a	Herbert Smith	49	9	44	102
	33	n/a	Brodies	58	15	29	102
	34	n/a	Wright Hasall	57	18	27	102
	35	n/a	Thorntons Law LLP	38	16	46	100
	36	n/a	Martineau	53	16	31	100
	37	n/a	Eversheds	41	6	49	96
	38	n/a	Thomson Snell & Passmore	63	10	23	96
	39	n/a	Ashurst	63	10	23	96
	40	n/a	Weightmans	63	10	23	96
	41	n/a	Birkett Long	48	9	37	94
	42	n/a	Maclay Murray & Spens	48	9	37	94
	43	n/a	Capsticks Solicitors LLP	51	13	26	90
	44	n/a	Bird & Bird	51	13	26	90
	45	n/a	Gateley	51	13	26	90
	46	n/a	Irwin Mitchell	57	10	23	90
	47	n/a	Pemberton Greenish LLP	57	6	26	89
	48	n/a	Reed Smith	49	10	30	89
	49	n/a	Clyde & Co	57	6	26	89
	50	n/a	Addleshaw Goddard	59	10	20	89
	51	n/a	SNR Denton	49	10	30	89
	52	n/a	Pannone	57	6	26	89
	53	n/a	Dickinson Dees	59	10	20	89
	54	n/a	Mishcon de Reya	49	10	30	89
	55	n/a	Stewarts Law LLP	57	10	22	89
	56	n/a	Shoosmith	43	15	30	88
	57	n/a	Edwin Coe LLP	55	5	28	88
	58	n/a	Rusell Jones & Walker	50	10	28	88
	59	n/a	TLT	58	12	18	88
	60	n/a	Farrer & Co	59	10	18	87
	61	n/a	Speecly Bircham	57	10	20	87
	62	n/a	Walker Morris	58	9	20	87
	63	n/a	Gordons LLP	58	9	18	85
	64	n/a	Baker & McKenzie	56	11	18	85
	65	n/a	Hammonds	58	9	18	85
	66	n/a	Cobbetts	43	15	26	84
	67	n/a	Barlow Robbins LLP	50	10	24	84
	68	n/a	Holman Fenwick & Willan	50	10	24	84
	69	n/a	Macfarlanes	50	10	24	84
	70	n/a	Blake Lapthorn	38	16	29	83
	71	n/a	Lewis Silkin	35	10	38	83
	72	n/a	Freshfields	35	10	38	83
	73	n/a	Stephenson Harwood	38	16	29	83
	74	n/a	Trowers & Hamlins	38	16	29	83
	75	n/a	Kennedys	35	10	38	83
	76	n/a	Bevan Brittan	38	16	29	83
	77	n/a	Howard Kennedy	35	10	38	83
	78	n/a	Shepherd & Wederburn	35	10	38	83
	79	n/a	Clarke Willmott	50	10	22	82
	80	n/a	Beachcroft	43	15	23	81
	81	n/a	Thomas Eggar	39	8	30	77
	82	n/a	Watson Farley & Williams	35	7	33	75
	83	n/a	Berrymans	26	18	31	75
	84	n/a	Browne Jacobson	30	16	29	75
	85	n/a	Ince & Co	37	11	27	75
	86	n/a	Manches	45	6	24	75
	87	n/a	Lovells	39	8	27	74
	88	n/a	Keoghs	39	8	27	74
	89	n/a	DWF	37	8	27	72
	90	n/a	Barlow Lyde & Gilbert	30	12	29	71
	91	n/a	Bircham Dyson Bell	26	16	29	71
	92	n/a	LG	43	10	18	71
	93	n/a	Withers LLP	39	8	23	70
	94	n/a	Osborne Clarke	26	16	28	70
	95	n/a	Fishburns	43	6	21	70
	96	n/a	Slaughters	43	6	20	69
	97	n/a	Taylor Wessing	26	16	26	68
	98	n/a	Charles Russell	43	6	19	68
	99	n/a	Olswang	39	6	18	63
	100	n/a	Mcgrigors	26	10	26	62